A Confucian Conception of Critical Thinking. Make and judge value judgments: Judges well the quality of an argument, including the acceptability of its reasons, assumptions, and evidence 6. What is your main point? Formulates plausible hypotheses; plans experiments well 9. Reflection and Perspective Part II.
Upload document Create flashcards. What are the facts? Your e-mail Input it if you want to receive answer. Identify and handle irrelevance e. What do you mean by…? Balancing, weighing, deciding The next two abilities involve advanced clarification. Jeffrey Maynes – – Informal Logic 37 2:
Seek alternative hypotheses, explanations, conclusions, plans, sources, etc.
Science Logic and Mathematics. For complaints, use another form.
On the Norms of Critical Thinking. Major criteria but not necessary conditions, except for the first: Be reflectively aware of their own basic beliefs 3. Follow problem solving steps b.
Reflection and Perspective Part II. Add to collection s Add to saved. Judge the credibility of a source. Robert Ermis – – Teaching Philosophy 14 1: Identify or formulate a question b.
SUPER-STREAMLINED CONCEPTION OF CRITICAL THINKING
Request removal from index. A Confucian Conception of Critical Thinking. Ethnic groups in Ethiopia.
Ennis – – Inquiry: Added to PP index Total views 48of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 30 19, of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Monitor one’s own thinking that is, engage in metacognition c. Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: Teaching Philosophy 14 1: Consequences of accepting or rejecting the judgment c. Integrates all items in this list when deciding what to believe or do Critical Thinkers are disposed to: Employ a reasonable critical thinking checklist Find it on Scholar.
Interpretation of logical terminology in ennsi, including 1 Negation and double negation 2 Necessary and sufficient condition language 3 Such words as “only”, “if and criticsl if”, “or”, “some”, “unless”, “not both”.
Robert Ennis, Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception – PhilPapers
Employ appropriate rhetorical strategies in discussion and presentation orally and in writingincluding employing and reacting to “fallacy” labels in an appropriate manner. Philosophy of Education in Philosophy of Social Science categorize this paper.
Be well informed d. Making a Case for Repeatability of Courses Consider these two. EDP — Diverse Abilities. Minimal inferring involved b. What would be an example? Anand Jayprakash Vaidya – – Metaphilosophy 44 4: Can well develop and defend a reasonable position 7.
Care to present a position honestly and clearly, theirs as well as others’. Draws conclusions when warranted, but with caution