RESEARCH PAPER 04/82

More about this item Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. A Question of Loyalty addresses the issues regarding ministers and departments avoiding taking accountability for actions and the politicised nature of accountability. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, This system is seemingly opposed to collective responsibility. The relationship portrayed by the characters in A Question of Loyalty shows with great effect the core functions of the roles of a minster and the chief executive. This meant that there were members of the executive reporting to individuals who were not part of government, and therefore not accountable to collective responsibility of the Cabinet White,

This is a concept that has become clouded in proportional systems such as New Zealand with the introduction of ministers outside of Cabinet as well as minority coalitions White, These changes allowed the removal of a chief executive and caused the position to be less secure. You can help adding them by using this form. Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services. However, this does prove to be beneficial for the relationship in coalitions between minority parties that may have strong opinions against the view of their larger coalition partners White, Hacker then can be held responsible for his department but not to blame.

Effect of Inflation on the Profitability and Valuation of U.S. Corporations

In A Question of Loyalty the difficulties with the public service does not come from issues of political bias towards a party ideologies but due to a dislike of elected ministers making policy decision instead of public servants.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item’s handle: What have we learned and to what end? rresearch

  EPEKTO NG BAWAL NA GAMOT SA PAMAYANAN ESSAY

The PM and resfarch set policy goals, ministers then take these aims for policy and set policies for respective departments White, Accountability and Collective Responsibility. Effect of Inflation on the Profitability and Valuation of U. You can help correct errors and omissions.

A Question of Loyalty.

research paper 04/82

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item.

Politics in New Zealand 3rd edition.

research paper 04/82

Download full text from publisher File URL: However, it is meant to ensure that the functionality of public servants is not affected by the political stances of the minister or party in charge Mulgan, General contact details of provider: This political neutrality is not expected to unrealistically cause public servants to be blind or un-sympathetic to the political options.

Remember me on this computer. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. By Michelangelo Vercesi and Cristina Barbieri.

It is only when the minister discovers that there would be a positive gain to claiming responsibility that he acts in an accountable way. Hacker then can be held responsible for his department but not to blame.

However, as the minster he is ultimately responsible for the actions of the department. As ministers manage the department overall and are expected to explain the conduct of those inside the department, they are seen as accountable and responsible.

research paper 04/82

Individual ministerial responsibility is where a minister is responsible for the overall actions of their department; active inside this idea is the issue of accountability. Humphrey Appleby, the permanent secretary is often suggested to give advice against policies or actions that would cause change in the department of the minster James Hacker.

For technical questions ppaer this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Labour lead government, with the Green Party as their major coalition partner, agreed to allow the Green Party members in parliament to influence actions made by cabinet without actually offering the Green Party any ministerial portfolios.

  DEPED ALS SAMPLE ESSAY

This complexity between responsibility and blame comes across strongly in A Question of Loyalty, as the ministers and researh permanent secretary are succeeding in avoiding accountability for the over spending and also succeeding in not correcting the issue. This meant that there were members of the executive reporting to rezearch who were not part of government, and therefore not accountable to collective responsibility of the Cabinet White, We can see this from the motivation the James Hacker receives from the PM, who needs a minister to become publically accountable in order to force cuts in 004/82.

Effect of Inflation on the Profitability and Valuation of U.S. Corporations

Click here to sign up. Check on the provider’s web page whether it is in fact available. To find whether it is available, there are three options: Although there are times when the positions of chief executives are reviewed there was no intention for this to coincide with elections, nor is it common for changes in government paperr coincide with reviews of chief executives Mulgan, General contact details of provider: Collective responsibility is where reseafch have accountability to represent the government as a whole.

These changes allowed the removal of a chief executive and caused the position to be less secure. Palmer Bridled Power.