Method and instruments The engineering teachers’ oral communication competence was broken down into 12 indicators according to the structure of any lecture: Amplify them using Learn higher. Guidelines for Public Speaking. The current research aims at identifying the extent to which academic engineering teaching staff’s communication competences are highly appreciated by their students. Learn higher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector.
You must focus on: Editura Didactica si Pedagogica. Quallities of effective teachers. Hence, this interest is due to the fact that: The ability to draw attention is highly appreciated by engineering students studying Electrical Engineering and Chemistry 3. The current research aims at identifying the extent to which academic engineering teaching staff’s communication competences are highly appreciated by their students.
A key observation is the relevance of a self-assessment analysis on teachers’ part to follow up the present research. Perception of Student Teachers rdview Teaching Competencies. American International Journal of Contemporary.
Learning Development Research
Accurate and appropriate speaking mean 3. The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: Retrieved from World Wide Web 9 mai http: The present study focuses on the oral communictaion competence acquired by the academic teaching staff. The Relationship between Higher Education and Employment. LearnHigher is a national community of study skills and learning development professionals.
Smith make the key observation that, in higher education, both teachers and students must develop oral communication competence. The Challenge of Effective Speaking 10th ed. We aim to support the development of such resources as well as conduct and disseminate research into the use and effectiveness of learning development strategies and materials. A useful framework for understanding communication competence was designed by Spitzbergp.
Comunicarea educationala in context scolar. Learn higher News Prize draw announcement coming soon!
1 LearnHigher Oral Communication Literature Review
A Publication of The Harriet W. In this sense, some key aspects are emphasized for each part of the presentation Mazilescu, Dragomir, et al,pp. Indicator 1 – Clear structure; Indicator 2 – Accessible presentation, easy to understand; Indicator 3 – Self-management and confidence; Indicator 4- Accurate and appropriate speaking, Indicator 5 – Appropriate posture; Indicator 6 – Modern visual aids efficiently used.
Editura Didactica si Pedagogica. Thus, teachers must assist students in practicing various communication means, mainly oral, so much so this ensures success in oral examinations, project presentation literqture employability.
1 LearnHigher Oral Communication Literature Review Free pdf download – –
Target group The questionnaire was administered to students -beneficiaries of numerous lectures, over three years. Conclusions and recommendations The results have helped identify both the strong points of an oral presentation as delivered by engineering teachers: Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Learnhighed purpose of the study is to identify the weaknesses and strengths to be improved and worked on by the engineering teaching staff when compelled to deliver oral presentations, since communicative competence is a prerequisite both for the didactic process and research dissemination.
Adding your resources is a great way to amplify their reach across the UK and beyond! Popular Resources Here are some of our most popular learnhighe Read more about our history.
Research findings and outcomes The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: About us LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher orql sector. According to the type of language used in education, the communicative competences are as follows: Rationale A useful framework for understanding communication competence was designed by Spitzbergp.
American International Journal of Contemporary Research.
Why Educational Technology has Failed. By oral communication, lectures provide students with valuable information and fosters cognitive, creative, communicative, sensitive, moral abilities etc, in short, an overall perspective on life and world” Vintanu, p. Moreover, Stronge stresses the importance comjunication the communication competence as one that distinguishes between an efficient and inefficient teacher and, thus, the main beneficiaries are the students who obtain such competence through teacher interactions.