Providing context for the paper in a cover letter not only can help the editors reach a quicker decision but also can sometimes tip the balance in favor of sending a borderline paper out for peer review. As editors, we meet a lot of researchers at conferences and lab visits and many papers are pitched to us. I would argue that a very junior scholar might have good reasons to leave out her status and her interests. As editors, we meet a lot of researchers at conferences and lab visits and many papers are pitched to us. Featured , General Interest , Journal Policy. Ackoff is less well known in information systems.
I just think that expectations and practices surrounding this issue have shifted, at least in my field. But editors may not be aware of the nuances of various approaches to address a methodological problem and are more likely to reject a paper without peer review when the advance over previous work is not clear.
I agree with Michael Hoffman.
If other papers using the data set have been published, plesae indicate the differences between the submitted paper and the other published papers. Chi Ho Li P. Our decisions are based on whether we think the paper will be a good editorial fit for the journal, not on the laurels of the authors or because someone important in the field suggested that they submit the work to Nature Methods And finally, a minor editorial pet peeve: Here are some practical tips for potential authors.
Chi, but the work of Dr.
Instructions for Authors: Sample Cover Letter
Chi, but the work of Dr. This is also the place to list researchers that you believe should be excluded from reviewing the paper. The letter should be on letterhead if it is available for your use.
Explain how it will have an impact and why the method and its applications will be interesting to a letetr biological audience. Do mention if you have previously discussed the work with an editor.
Many authors are hesitant to compare their work to previous methods for fear that it will appear to reviewers that they are putting down the contributions of other researchers.
Please note that the names of excluded reviewers should also be included in the relevant field of the online submission form. Previous post How to write a rebuttal bjpg.
Journal publishing EnglishRace, Regionalism, and Nationalism. We encourage questions, comments and feedback below. Learn how your comment data is processed. The major revisions to bjpg ICIS paper include …. Chi, but the work of Dr. It is not under consideration at another journal or at MIS Quarterly. It is not simply an archaic form of communication that is becoming obsolete in a digital world; rather, it should xover viewed as an opportunity to convey many important pieces of information about a paper to the editors.
How To Write a Journal Article Submission Cover Letter
Such a summary is especially crucial for highly technical papers, where the chance that the advance coved not be fully appreciated by the editors is often higher.
Top tags in this blog method development data software brain science funding publishing NIH peer review analysis optogenetics. Even less is required for the online systems.
I will put this on my blog too, which I rarely update. Do mention any unusual circumstances. FeaturedGeneral InterestJournal happeningsStatistics. Of course, whether the editor decides to use any of the suggested referees is up to him or her. Please note that the names of excluded reviewers should also be included in the relevant field of the online submission form.
Do give a brief, largely non-technical summary of the method. The nominees for senior editor, associate editor, and reviewers have no conflict of interest with any of the authors of the paper being submitted.
It is not simply an archaic form of communication that is becoming obsolete in a digital world; rather, it should be viewed as an opportunity to convey many important pieces of information about a paper to the editors.
I agree with Michael Hoffman.