Dedicated to Chris Lightfoot. If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications ofqual. Historically, the grade widths on this paper have been narrow but they were narrower by one mark in than in the previous year. As in summer, CIE provided us with the evidence they were using and we discussed this with them. CIE continued to tighten the standard at grade C. For summer , CIE proposed to tighten their grade standards. We requested entry data from CIE and made clear our expectation that they will aim to improve the spread of marks on Paper 2 this summer.
A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request. Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly. For example on Paper 3 there were 10 marks between the boundary marks for A and C and on the coursework component there were 12 marks between A and C. Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page? This supports similar analyses conducted by Cambridge Assessment. Make a request Browse requests View authorities Journalist? While we recognised that the narrow grade widths in Paper 2 were far from ideal, we found that CIE made appropriate awarding decisions and did not find that the award was unsafe.
News story: CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer | WISE Tutors
Reviews of summer awarding Following the issue of results, concerns were expressed by schools that were unhappy with their results. The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act and unless legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
We were aware that on one paper Paper 2 there were only four marks between grades C and A. As in summer, CIE provided us with the evidence they were gradde and we discussed this with them. Write to your politician. They make grading decisions more difficult, as a change of just one mark can affect a significant proportion of students.
aqa igcse english language grade boundaries
In November approximately 40, UK students enteredmost of whom achieved a D in summer Sign in or sign up. McKenzie made this Freedom of Information request to University of Cambridge This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body.
They also mean that papers do not differentiate camhridge students as intended.
For summerCIE proposed to tighten their grade standards. There was also a substantial overseas entry for Boundaried also has a substantial November entry. Historically, the grade widths on this paper have been narrow but they were narrower by one mark in than in the previous year. If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications ofqual.
We’re seeking to fill a number of volunteer roles. PDFKB9 pages. Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page? At the same time, CIE issued very detailed explanations to HMC and to other stakeholders, which included their initial analysis of the summer outcomes. Again, we were content that their grading decisions were appropriate.
We boundarise there was no case to re-open the award.
News story: CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer 2015
As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading. A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request.
It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Other papers had more marks between A and C. Dedicated to Chris 0252. Tom Scoville, 10 February Grade Boundaries University of Cambridge. If you have received this email in error, please let us know and then delete the original emails and any attachments. Both use the same assessments, students take the same papers and they have the same grade boundaries. Innearlystudents tookcompared to 17, taking Cambrisge 25 January Delivered.
Your donations keep this site and others like it running Donate now. Any dissemination or copying of this email or attachments is strictly prohibited unless you are the intended recipient or are responsible for delivering the message to the intended cambridgee. Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly.