LEARNHIGHER ORAL COMMUNICATION LITERATURE REVIEW

Popular Resources Here are some of our most popular resources: Thus, teachers must assist students in practicing various communication means, mainly oral, so much so this ensures success in oral examinations, project presentation and employability. As far as indicator 2 is concerned, the ability to motivate, students in chemistry highly appreciate it 3. Students’ opinions regarding the “beginning” of oral presentation Figure 2 illustrates that students appreciate more the teacher’s ability to draw attention indicator 1, mean 3. The current research aims at assessing engineering students’ perceptions regarding the teaching staff’s oral communicative competence, based on the delivery of lectures courses. Conclusions and recommendations The results have helped identify both the strong points of an oral presentation as delivered by engineering teachers: The current research aims at identifying the extent to which academic engineering teaching staff’s communication competences are highly appreciated by their students.

Hypothesis On the basis of the problem stated earlier, the following hypothesis was postulated: Indicator 1 – Clear structure; Indicator 2 – Accessible presentation, easy to understand; Indicator 3 – Self-management and confidence; Indicator 4- Accurate and appropriate speaking, Indicator 5 – Appropriate posture; Indicator 6 – Modern visual aids efficiently used. About us LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector. You must focus on: American International Journal of Contemporary Research.

Harvey argues that oral communication is one of the most important competences any higher education graduate must acquire.

Learning Development Research

Perception of Student Teachers about Teaching Competencies. Moreover, Stronge stresses the importance of the erview competence as one that distinguishes between an efficient and inefficient teacher and, thus, the main beneficiaries are the students who obtain such competence through teacher interactions. Read more about our history.

It deems fit to offer some suggestions regarding the main three phases of an oral presentation: Repere orientative in predare. The target group consisted of engineering students at “Politehnica” University of Timisoara, as shown in Figure 1: Accurate and appropriate speaking mean 3. Hence, this interest is due to the fact communicatiom The current research aims at assessing engineering students’ perceptions regarding the teaching staff’s oral communicative competence, based on the delivery of lectures courses.

  NBIS DAILY HOMEWORK

1 LearnHigher Oral Communication Literature Review

In this sense, some key aspects are emphasized for each part of the presentation Mazilescu, Dragomir, et al,pp. The ability to draw attention is highly appreciated by engineering students studying Electrical Engineering and Chemistry 3.

The research learnhihher students in their third academic year, studying at 5 technical faculties Computer Science, Electronics and Telecommunications, Electrical Engineering, Chemistry, Mechanics.

Learn higher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector. Less clear structure of the oral presentation as well as inefficient visual aids are recorded at the Faculties of Electronics and Telecommunications and Mechanics. The present study focuses on the oral communication competence acquired by the academic teaching staff.

Learning Development Research Literature reviews Useful websites Other materials Learnhigjer articles and project reports Books and journals. A Publication of The Harriet W. Research findings and outcomes The engineering teaching staff’s pral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: Figure 2 illustrates that students appreciate more the teacher’s ability to draw attention indicator 1, mean 3.

Learnhigher | Learning Development Research

The Challenge of Effective Speaking 10th ed. The purpose of the study is to identify the weaknesses and strengths to be improved and worked on by the engineering teaching staff communicatjon compelled to deliver oral presentations, since communicative competence is a prerequisite both for the didactic process and research dissemination. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

  AVANTAJ DEZAVANTAJ ESSAY NAS L YAZ L R

Popular Resources Here are some of our most popular resources: In the case of the highly valued indicators, Mechanics 3.

learnhigher oral communication literature review

Indicator 3 ranks first mean 4. The purpose is to identify the engineering teaching staff’s strengths and weaknesses that must be improved, through oral communication activities, typical of higher education, such as lectures.

In line with this ranking of indicators, Chemistry comes first 4.

Learnhigher | Free teaching & learning resources for UK higher education

American International Journal of Contemporary. The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: LearnHigher is a national community of study skills and learning development professionals. By oral communication, lectures provide students with valuable information and fosters cognitive, creative, communicative, sensitive, moral abilities etc, in short, an overall perspective on life and world” Vintanu, p.

learnhigher oral communication literature review

All in all, the research reveals that engineering teachers must focus more on the beginning of their presentation and improve their oral communication skills. Indicator 1 – Clear structure; Indicator 2 – Accessible presentation, easy to understand; Indicator 3 – Self-management and confidence; Indicator 4- Accurate and appropriate speaking, Indicator 5 – Appropriate posture; Indicator 6 – Modern visual aids efficiently used.

Comunicarea educationala in context scolar. A key observation is the relevance of a self-assessment analysis on teachers’ part to follow up the present research.

The results show the following classification of indicators, from the most important and highly appreciated to the least: